[ Pobierz całość w formacie PDF ]
JoelSkousen.com: Analysis of Strategic Threats
ANALYSIS OF STRATEGIC THREATS
IN THE CURRENT DECADE
(2000-2010)
By Joel M. Skousen
Editor,
Homepage:
INTRODUCTION
Strategic threats
are carefully planned threats by predator nations or groups that transcend their own normal
sphere of influence and threaten the entire world with conquest and/or control. In this analysis I will discuss
three
current strategic world powers, which constitute a premeditated threat to world liberty, and the complex
tactical maneuvers between them as they position themselves for the coming, inevitable conflict. Two of these
world powers are nations--
Russia
and
China
--and the third is a transnational conspiracy of power by a
combination of individuals in the West attempting to maneuver the world into a
New World Order
(NWO) of
global control, euphemistically masquerading as a "global democracy." I will refer to the latter as
Western
globalists
.
All less powerful nations in the world fall under the influence of one of these three powers, either as
direct allies, client states for the purchase of arms, and/or diplomatic allies working in collusion to further
strategic goals of global hegemony. There is one further complicating factor, however. The Western globalists
are divided into two main factions: a US/British faction firmly in control of the financial means of the NWO,
and a European faction of hard-core leftists, secretly aligned with Moscow, which controls the majority of votes
in the General Assembly of the UN. I will attempt to describe each of the three power centers, their allies, and
what I believe their individual strategy involves.
THREE COMPETING PREDATOR CENTERS OF POWER
RUSSIA
Ever since the rise of the Bolsheviks in 1917, all of Russia’s resources have been focused on building a world
empire under Communism. Despite taking no pains to conceal its ultimate goal of destruction of capitalism
Russia has been curiously
assisted by certain Western political and financial powers
in its spreading
Communism to other nations. Numerous books document damning evidence of US State Department collusion
with the CIA and key Western journalists to facilitate Communist takeovers of Eastern Europe, China, North
Korea, Cuba, Cambodia, Vietnam, Nicaragua, Iran, Angola, Mozambique and numerous other small nations.
But the mother of all deceptions was reserved for the carefully planned "
fall of the Soviet Union
" in 1989 and
1990.
THE PHONY DEMISE OF THE SOVIET UNION
This
last great ruse
by Russia was a carefully planned gesture, not unlike previous attempts by Lenin and
http://www.worldaffairsbrief.com/keytopics/threats.html (1 of 18)23-12-2004 05:21:56
 JoelSkousen.com: Analysis of Strategic Threats
Stalin to put on a more human face in order to secure needed technology transfers and monetary assistance
from the West. The latest and most sophisticated version of the masquerade will culminate in Russia’s long
anticipated attack on the West. Soviet defector Anatoly Golitsyn, in 1984, warned the CIA and the world about
this ruse in his book, "
New Lies For Old,
" but it was given little publicity. Golitsyn, not yet savvy about the
high level treason that had a grip upon the US government and the establishment media, could not figure out
why no one was interested in his warning. Not only were Western intelligence agencies and the press
not
interested
in Golitsyn’s warning, they were about to join in the propaganda
promoting this deception
in order to
make sure Western observers would believe it.
The Berlin Wall did, in fact, come down in 1989 and the Soviet armies did leave Europe in 1990, but the
freedom movement and the overthrow of Communist regimes by "reformers" were not as spontaneous as they
were made to appear. Anyone close to the action could see huge holes in the story--holes that a scrutinizing
press corps should easily have perceived, but chose not to. Uncharacteristically, the
freedom movement
among
university students in
Leipzig
had suddenly began to flourish, uninhibited by the
Stazi
, deep within the East
German police state. No Western journalist dared utter the obvious question: why were students who had not
dared to demonstrate the week before, suddenly free to do so without reprisal? Orders had obviously been given
to the secret police to give the students a free hand. All student organizations had been infiltrated but no arrests
of dissidents were made. Assurances were planted among student leaders that demonstrations would be
tolerated. At least two heads of Eastern European states (
Erik Honeker
of the DDR and
Nicolai Ceausescu
of
Romania) said prior to their deaths that the Russians had ordered them to step down (as if in response to public
fervor), and to turn over power to specific groups that had quickly put on the mask of "reformers," but that were
still Soviet controlled. Honeker obeyed and was allowed to live, while Ceausescu refused and was killed by his
own secret police. Romanians weren’t fooled by the sudden change in leadership in Romania; most knew the
new "anti-Communist" leaders were still part of the old guard.
A CRITICAL LOOK AT THE ATTEMPTED GORBACHEV "COUP"
A close look at the failed "
coup
" against Russian Premier
Mikhail Gorbachev
will easily demonstrate that this
was an obvious fraud set up for Western consumption. Anyone who believes the KGB was so bungling that it
couldn’t capture Gorbachev at his unprotected dacha, or so tolerant that it would allow any real democratic
opposition to maintain uninhibited access to radio and television, hasn’t studied modern Russian police state
tactics. In fact, Yeltsin was never anything but a puppet figurehead present to give the illusion of an emerging
democracy. Furthermore, when the supposed heads of the
KGB,
and
GRU,
as well as the
Defense Minister
and other top leaders "fled for their lives" after the "failed coup attempt," the press should have been asking:
who were they fleeing from? These men were supposedly in control of all the organs of power in Russia. Either
they really were the heads and were faking their own self-imposed exile, or they were not the real leaders and
were toppled to further the ruse. Notably, all of these top "leaders," including Gorbachev, had been only
mid-
level bureaucrats two years before. How do we explain their sudden rise to power, except that others selected
them
? And if other hidden leaders selected them, those secret leaders hold the real power today. Everything else
that gives the appearance of Russian democracy is just window dressing for Western consumption. That isn’t to
say that the Russians haven’t allowed some legitimate opposition to arise, but it is always kept in a minority
status and without access to the real reins of power.
It is my contention that the Communist leaders are still in charge behind the scenes today. In fact they never
were out of power. I’m not referring to the stodgy old hard liners that are playing the role of open Communist
deputies in the Duma (Russian Parliament). The real Russian leaders, like Boris Berezovsky, bequeathed to
themselves all the former state enterprises (under the guise of "privatization") and are now referred to as the
Russian Mafia. Even a cursory look at their backgrounds, shows that virtually every one of these "Mafia" chiefs
was a top Communist leader in some part of the former Soviet leadership. The Communist bosses have also
maintained tight control over the Russian banking system so as to shuffle Western aid money back and forth
between their secret slush funds in Europe and the Middle East. As evidence of the power plays behind the
scenes, one astute observer noticed that President Boris Yeltsin, at a high level meeting in the Kremlin, stepped
http://www.worldaffairsbrief.com/keytopics/threats.html (2 of 18)23-12-2004 05:21:56
 JoelSkousen.com: Analysis of Strategic Threats
aside and let Boris Berezovsky enter the room first. This would never be done in Russian protocol unless
Berezovsky were Yeltsin’s superior. Naturally, these real powers behind the Russian "democracy" generally
stay behind the scenes and rarely take key government positions--just as in the West where powerful men direct
affairs from behind the scenes.
WHO ARE THE REAL LEADERS IN RUSSIA?
To further the deception, current Russian president Vladimir Putin continually rails against Russian Mafia
leaders like
Berezovsky
and
Gusinsky
, issuing a steady stream of indictments, as if the Russian government is
actively pursuing these international criminals. Of course, it’s all a ruse. As I have reported in my
World
Affairs Briefs
, Spanish intelligence documented
five visits
last year that Putin made to Berezovsky’s villa in
Spain just prior to Yeltsin’s downfall and Putin’s rise to power. The transcripts of their overheard discussions
were apparently centered around the need to dump Yeltsin, install Putin, and begin the process of slowly
shedding Russia’s feigned image of weakness in order to get the West accustomed to a new, assertive Russia.
As if following a script, Putin has suddenly become the new champion of Russian nationalism. He’s "tough on
crime" and supposedly opposed by liberals and old-line Communists alike. Again, it’s all a ruse. Even
Gusinsky, head of the
MOST
media group--Putin’s supposed arch enemy and media opposition--is playing the
role of a persecuted capitalist Jew. In fact, he is a good friend of Berezovsky and has a villa in the same
compound in Spain.
A TOUCH OF TRUTH IN EVERY DECEPTION
Am I saying that everything was faked in the so-called fall of Communism? Not at all. The yearning of Eastern
Europeans and Russians to be free was real. That part didn’t have to be faked. But several Eastern European
states are still under Russian silent control. Even the Russian pull-back of weapons was a partial lie. After
negotiating the removal of US missiles and nuclear weapons from Europe (
INF treaty
) the Soviets allowed US
inspectors to witness the destruction of the longer-range SS-20 missiles, which constituted the bulk of their
European force. But in 1986 the Russians secretly moved in more modern, shorter-range
SS-23s
to deep
underground bunkers in East Germany, Czechoslovakia and Bulgaria just prior to signing the treaty, and never
declared them or destroyed them. They didn’t remove them even after the so-called "fall of the Soviet Union,"
demonstrating Russia’s follow-on role in this fraud, even during Yeltsin’s supposed democratic regime. The
missiles in Slovakia were discovered and removed during the mid-90s, but neither the US government nor the
press has asked about the contents of other secret bunkers--which still exist today.
A portion of the image of
economic and military weakness
in Russia is real, however. The civilian economy
is truly in shambles--thanks to Western sabotage of the "free-market" reforms and continued hidden economic
control by the Communist-Mafia hierarchy. What else would you expect when the US government pays
millions of dollars to a leftist university like Harvard to direct the reforms? Essential elements such as private
property rights and transportation were never freed from Soviet-style control. Regulations and bureaucratic red
tape still abound, as does official corruption requiring huge pay-offs and bribes. When Russia complained about
its dire straits and perennial threat of famine, President Clinton and European leaders shipped them millions of
dollars in monetary and food aid. In fact, there was no famine. Russian farmers had plenty of crops to sell, but
they were displaced in the markets by the US food aid, which was sold to the people by Russian leaders for a
tidy profit.
FEIGNING WEAKNESS TO HIDE STRENGTH
As for
military weakness
, only the manpower side of Russian military was allowed to collapse. The Russians
purposely failed to pay troops or to maintain normal living standards within the ranks, leading to bad feelings
http://www.worldaffairsbrief.com/keytopics/threats.html (3 of 18)23-12-2004 05:21:56
 JoelSkousen.com: Analysis of Strategic Threats
and discontent. However, Russian
production and development of high tech conventional military
equipment
has been ongoing. Huge stockpiles of tanks and mobile artillery were simply taken out of current
inventory and stockpiled. They remain dispersed in depots beyond the Ural Mountains as part of the
Conventional Forces Treaty
signed with the US and NATO. This neat little treaty allowed the Russians to
match US reduction in forces without actually destroying equipment--the Russians only had to put their tanks
"out of reach." In fact, the Russians brought back some of that inventory during the Chechen conflict, and the
US let them get away with it without so much as an official protest. Additionally, although many of the rank-
and-file soldiers have left the military, the Russians did not decommission their huge corps of officers and
NCOs. Thus, Russia maintains a suspiciously top-heavy manpower structure allowing it to refill the ranks of
soldiers in a matter of months should war break out.
REAL DISARMAMENT?
What about Russia’s highly touted
disarmament of nuclear forces?
This, too, is a grand deception, aided and
abetted by US arms controllers. The older, out-dated aspects of the Russian military complex are on display to
give the appearance of disarmament. Much of that has been dismantled at US taxpayer expense. US public
television and the Clinton Pentagon joined forces to promote the image of Russian nuclear weakness with a
highly doctored presentation entitled
Missiliers,
about the crumbling Soviet arsenal. A naive US General
Habiger of US Strategic Command lent his credentials to the widely publicized
TV documentary
, which
supposedly showed an inside view of the old and decrepit Soviet-era nuclear bunkers. It fact, they were too old
and too decrepit to be credible. US missiliers who saw the documentary refused to believe those facilities were
operational. With the exception of one limited view of the new SS-27 missile launcher, the US has never been
allowed to see Russian’s modern arsenal of weapons. Many of the older SS-18 ICBMs were dismantled in the
1990s with US taxpayer funds. The warheads, however, were not dismantled, but were
given back to the
Russians for recycling into their new missiles. The Russians are clearly implementing Sun Tzu’s classic war
doctrine of "feigning weakness" prior to a strike.
ONGOING WEAPONS DEPLOYMENT
The top secret Russian military-industrial complex is in full production, but it is now quite separated from the
normal, visible economy. Many suspect that Western aid and loans are almost exclusively funneled into these
hidden portions of the Russian economy. This sustains the need for continual funding from the West to support
the deprived civilian economy in Russia. However, despite feigning weakness, the Russians are continuing to
build tremendous new nuclear/biological and chemical weapons systems--all with the assistance of US
technology transfers.
In the late 1980s, the Soviet Union was seen deploying
biological warheads
for their multiple-warhead SS-18
ICBMs. As late as the early 1990s, after the signing of agreements pledging to destroy all biological and
chemical warfare stocks, bona fide defectors from Russia gave testimony of massive cheating on biological and
chemical weapons programs. Again, no protest was forthcoming from the US and no sanctions were imposed.
Russia is now deploying, on average, three new
SS-27
missiles (also called the Topol-M--a 6th generation
ballistic missile with active maneuvering capability to evade interception) per month--replacing older SS-19
missiles located at the Sarakov missile based some 450 miles southeast of Moscow. The SS-27 can carry up to
10 small nuclear warheads, or can be armed with a single massive H-bomb developed by the Arzamas-16 site
of the Russian Ministry of Atomics (MINATOM). According to Russian weapons engineers, the new Arzamas
warhead has an explosive force equal to over half a million tons of TNT. The
Washington Times
has reported
that, in 1995 and 1996, this weapons developer illegally obtained US-made IBM supercomputers exported with
Clinton administration approval. The supercomputers were exported directly to the Russian weapons lab, using
false commercial and non-military contracts. This was in direct violation of US law. IBM pled guilty to the
illegal export and paid a $8.5 million fine for their illegal sale, but the damage was already done. Later
evidence proved that the Clinton administration actually facilitated the sale and gave IBM assurances of
http://www.worldaffairsbrief.com/keytopics/threats.html (4 of 18)23-12-2004 05:21:56
 JoelSkousen.com: Analysis of Strategic Threats
protection. The Russians intend to build a total of 500 of these mobile missiles, each one capable of mounting
the full range of nuclear, biological or chemical warheads. This is truly an ominous weapons system, and
should be our main concern in terms of designing an Anti-Ballistic Missile Defense. We built our last modern
ICBM (the MX "Peacekeeper" missile) over 10 years ago, and will begin disarming them unilaterally in 2003.
The
Russian ABM system
is composed of hundreds of SA-5 and SA-10 anti-aircraft/anti-missile missiles.
Moscow not only has its nominal 100 ABM missiles, as permitted by the treaty, but also several thousand other
SAM interceptors, many of which have been upgraded with ABM capabilities. In total, Russia has 12,000 SAM/
ABM interceptors at 280 sites. The SA-10 is a totally new missile now from what it used to be and continues to
be fitted with nuclear warheads (unlike our dumbed-down proposed ABM system that has
no warhead
at all).
Russia has 18 huge battle-management radar installations located around the periphery of the country, as well
as in space, to direct their ABM system. Upgrades of these radar sites as new construction of several more were
carried out during the ABM treaty negotiations. US and NATO spy satellites detected these violations, but only
one radar unit was halted. It was finished two years ago and the US failed to protest this violation of the ABM
treaty. Yet Russia still demands that we abide by the treaty.
Further, the Russians are building huge
underground nuclear bunkers and weapons production facilities
in
the Ural Mountains, clearly intended to function during a nuclear war. "
Yamantau Mountain
is the largest
nuclear-secure project in the world," said US Congressman Roscoe Bartlett (R-Md). "They have very large
train tracks running in and out of it [actually 5 tracks wide], with enormous rooms carved inside the mountain.
It has been built to resist a half dozen direct nuclear hits, one after the other in a direct hole. It's very disquieting
that the Russians are doing this when they [supposedly] don't have $200 million to build the service module on
the international space station and can't pay housing for their own military people." Ken Timmerman, one of
the best sources of information on the subject says, "The Russians have constructed two entire cities over the
site, known as Beloretsk 15 & 16, which are closed to the public, each with 30,000 workers. No foreigner has
ever set foot near the site. A US military attaché stationed in Moscow was turned back when he attempted to
visit the region a few years ago..."
In public testimony before a House Armed Services Subcommittee last October, KGB defector Col. Oleg
Gordievsky said the KGB had maintained a separate, top-secret organization, known as
Directorate 15
, to
build and maintain a network of underground command bunkers for the Soviet leadership -- including the vast
site beneath Yamantau Mountain. When pictures of this complex were published on the front page of the New
York Times in 1996, the CIA was asked to respond. Keeping pace with the long standing secret government
policy to protect Americans from any information that would point to a Russian threat, the CIA spokesman said
the agency wasn’t worried--the huge Russian facility was purely "defensive." How do they know that when
they admit that no US official has ever visited the site?
In 1998, US Strategic Commander (STRATCOM)
General Eugene Habiger
, the same naive commander who
took part in the NPR propaganda documentary
Missiliers
, called Yamantau "a very large complex -- we
estimate that it has millions of square feet available for underground facilities. We don't have a clue as to what
they're doing there." No clue, general? Not even one clue? People this stupid obviously get to be generals
because they are predictable yes-men in a military determined to purge out any future George Pattons or
Douglas MacArthurs. I noticed in
Missiliers
that Habiger never mentioned the Russian military’s refusal to
answer questions about Yamantau Mountain as he waxed eloquent about the deep
camaraderie and trust
he felt
with his Russian military counterparts. If this is the best general we can find to head STRATCOM, the US is in
mortal danger.
The Yamantau Mountain complex is not far from Russia's main nuclear weapons lab facility,
Chelyabinsk-70
.
Honest military analysts suspect that Yamantau’s huge 400-square-mile underground complex houses nuclear
warhead and missile storage sites, launch control, and several full-blown nuclear weapons factories--all
http://www.worldaffairsbrief.com/keytopics/threats.html (5 of 18)23-12-2004 05:21:56
  [ Pobierz całość w formacie PDF ]
  • zanotowane.pl
  • doc.pisz.pl
  • pdf.pisz.pl
  • zawrat.opx.pl
  • Archiwum
    Powered by wordpress | Theme: simpletex | © Nie można obronić się przed samym sobą.